On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, Brad House wrote:
> So, is this patch being rejected then?
I've not seen anyone reject it, so I'd say no it isn't. It's just not being
handled (yet).
I'm sorry for that, but we seem to have a shortage of developers with energy
and time to spend on c-ares. There has primarly been David Drysdale over the
last few years and a single man on the job isn't good. I'm personally
certainly guilty of not spending much time on c-ares these days.
Participants on this mailing list can help out by commenting/reviewing patches
or even voluntering for push access to get git repo to help the project
forward.
-- / daniel.haxx.seReceived on 2016-09-13