On 22/09/14 11:57, David Drysdale wrote:
> The code looks OK to me, but it might be easier to have an extra local
> variable (e.g. char *name) that is set to either sep->s_name or
> tmpbuf; that would reduce the code duplication. Maybe something like
> the following (untested)?
Good point. I'll send an updated series soon.
Received on 2014-09-28