On 05/02/2013 10:51 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> There's a large amount of added typecasts for malloc() and a few other
> void pointers in that patch. Why do we need them?
>
Because it's a first step to make c-ares compilable in C++ (I know you
don't care) and it doesn't hurt.
But since I don't want to start a holy war ;-), I've put a new patch in
attachment and we'll try to teach Coverity to ignore those.
Received on 2013-05-03