Subject: Re: Parsing of 'Additional Records' in SRV response

Re: Parsing of 'Additional Records' in SRV response

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:40:53 +0200 (CEST)

On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Jakub Hrozek wrote:

> I implemented the first version of the SRV parsing and I must confess I no
> longer remember why the additional record was not parsed, sorry.
>
> I'm sure a patch would be welcome.

Oh indeed. Sounds like an excellent idea to me!

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
Received on 2013-04-22