Subject: Re: adig.c calls perror()

Re: adig.c calls perror()

From: Gisle Vanem <gvanem_at_broadpark.no>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:24:00 +0200

"Daniel Stenberg" <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:

> Do we really need that function as part of the c-ares API? I realize that
> example is wrong, but is that reason enough to introduce a new function?

We could probably just drop perror() in adig.c. And just print
the error number from SOCKERRNO. Otherwise (to be complete)
we should get the correct text like get_winsock_error() does
for libcurl. Maybe it's too much work, but it would be nice to
copy/edit curl_strerror.c to ares_strerror.c.

--gv
Received on 2012-08-15