On 06/13/2011 07:40 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 06/13/2011 12:01 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>
>>> With that in mind, would c-ares upstream accept a patch that only
>>> falls back in case of AF_UNSPEC?
>>
>> In my mind that makes perfect sense so unless someone can argue against
>> it with convincing arguments, I will certainly accept such patches.
>>
>
> A patch is attached.
>
> Jakub
Any thoughts?
I think this patch has a potential on breaking things for various
people, so I wanted to get it peer-reviewed before pushing.
Received on 2011-06-30