On 06/13/2011 12:01 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>
>> With that in mind, would c-ares upstream accept a patch that only
>> falls back in case of AF_UNSPEC?
>
> In my mind that makes perfect sense so unless someone can argue against
> it with convincing arguments, I will certainly accept such patches.
>
A patch is attached.
Jakub