On Fri, 13 May 2011, David Stuart wrote:
> As a further follow-up to this. c-ares seems to suffer from the same problem
> as the resip-ares fork in this regard (though the code is substantially
> different).
Can I just add that I had no idea resip-ares existed until your mail just now.
Do you know what they've made with it and if they still maintain a separate
ares fork?
-- / daniel.haxx.seReceived on 2011-05-13