On 21 February 2011 14:57, Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Dima Tisnek wrote:
>
>> sorry about code style...
>>
>> of course there should be an option, I wasn't sure if it should be
>> configure opt or run-time opt and I didn't want to go into that, because,
>> well, I'm not so good with c-ares yet.
>
> Run-time, no question about it. It seems like something a particular
> application should be able to change/customize - and then I also include the
> timeout period not just ON/OFF.
is it reasonable to include some options in ares_init() where it
currently calls ares_init_options() without any options? or is this
some convention that should stay there?
Received on 2011-02-24