On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Krishna Rajendran <krishna_at_rajendran.org> wrote:
> It looks fine to me otherwise and seems to work as expected.
Spotted one issue. In ares_malloc_data in ares_data.c. The wrong union
member is being used.
+ case ARES_DATATYPE_MX_REPLY:
+ ptr->data.srv_reply.next = NULL;
+ ptr->data.srv_reply.host = NULL;
+ ptr->data.srv_reply.priority = 0;
+ break
-Krishna
Received on 2010-04-07