Subject: Re: IPv6 name servers support committed to CVS

Re: IPv6 name servers support committed to CVS

From: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek_at_redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:20:44 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/09/2010 07:07 PM, Yang Tse wrote:
> Has anyone else done any tests with the IPv6 name servers support, or
> is it simply that no news are good news?
>

Hi,

I have done some rudimentary testing of IPv6 support[1], more to come
when Red Hat QA grabs the updated packages. I (and also several other
members of our team) are running 1.7.0+the IPv6 patches extracted from
CVS on our laptops.

HTH,
Jakub

[1] get A/AAAA record via NS in /etc/resolv.conf, get A/AAAA record via
NS set with ares_set_servers(), test that ares_dup() works
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkuWu6EACgkQHsardTLnvCV5WQCg2g3TjY3ytMGyZC9EpWLKoMig
UDwAoN2zoBvaQZdGRTT9fp7wOL5QqKO1
=h/1C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on 2010-03-09