Subject: Re: [PATCH] ares_free_reply (Was: Re: [PATCH] ares_parse_txt_reply)

Re: [PATCH] ares_free_reply (Was: Re: [PATCH] ares_parse_txt_reply)

From: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek_at_redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:17:15 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/02/2009 07:59 PM, Yang Tse wrote:
> Hmm, I've started writing a theoretical comparison of both approaches,
> but I've deleted it all. Tomorrow most probably.I'm going to code my
> version, and afterwards I'll comment.

Hi,

is there anything I can help with, either with the generic free or just
polishing the next release in general?

        Jakub
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkr4MnsACgkQHsardTLnvCWECwCg1vS3J944hrF0Lp+Pcb5De5pH
c4YAn19iTuWb9MN/j2HdYu7jkD4E5Yd7
=76yV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on 2009-11-09