Subject: Re: c-ares API vs c-ares source code provided functions (Win32 recommended reading)

Re: c-ares API vs c-ares source code provided functions (Win32 recommended reading)

From: Guenter <lists_at_gknw.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:06:23 +0100

Hi,
Yang Tse schrieb:
> Yes, of course, there's also the option of adding them unconditionally
> to the c-ares API, probably ares_inet_ntop and ares_inet_pton deserve
> that 'honor', I'm not so sure the other ones do.
I would drop ares_strcasecmp, ares_strncasecmp completely; I never
understood why we not just do the usual defines for Win32 as we do with
libcurl too? These functions are obsolete, and should be removed.

Gün.
Received on 2009-11-03