-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/27/2009 07:23 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>
>> I know there had been a similar question asked by Daniel a couple of
>> months back, but since then, some other patches landed..so I wanted to
>> ask again - does c-ares upstream plan a new release to facilitate the
>> changes since 1.6.0?
>
> I'm all for doing a release. It's really not that much work.
>
Great, thank you!
> Let's work on getting the relevant patches applied, then give a few days
> for everything to settle and then release!
>
> So are there any patches that have faded away that we need to bring out
> into the light again?
>
- From my very selfish POV, I'd like the c-ares-$NEXT to contain the SRV
(already in HEAD, but the concerns raised during the TXT patch review
over renaming global structures should happen before release) and TXT
parsing routines.
Jakub
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkrotRUACgkQHsardTLnvCUfpACgo8fVwynsPncXkpUmKfWwJ8Xu
d1IAn0pUg7+7xA+PXk98svg4TezuGW0j
=B/3a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on 2009-10-28