On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:17:06AM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> You're right, I figure that's the spot-on answer why disabling Nagle is
> almost always a good idea: you're most likely to just do a single-shot DNS
> communication and then it'll take a while until the next one is done.
Mm. Still, I thought the Nagle algorithm only pauses if there's a single
byte waiting. It's more complexity on the way, though.
> Will you provide an updated patch with the #ifdef and added comment?
Attached.
/* Steinar */
-- Software Engineer, Google Norway