Subject: Re: ares_getopt

Re: ares_getopt

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:16:48 +0200 (CEST)

On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Yang Tse wrote:

> It can be argued that if it is actually inside the library it can be easier
> to use, and also that it shouldn't be in the library per-se since it has
> nothing to do with the async resolver.
>
> Someone with a stronger feeling or idea which way it should actually be than
> me ?

I vote for it to be left outside the actual library.

-- 
   c-ares -- my preferred DNS asynch resolver library
Received on 2007-04-14