Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> said:
> On Mon, 16 May 2005, codemastr wrote:
>
> > The one I'm referring to is the sockaddr_in6 redefinition. Does anyone
have
> > any ideas about that? I do have a configure check to find sockaddr_in6,
and
> > apparently it's failing on Netware. Is it in some different header? All
of
> > the other messages it reported should now be fixed, however I'm just not
> > sure what is causing the sockaddr_in6 messages. Perhaps a config.log
output
> > would help.
>
> The Netware build doesn't use configure, it uses a set config.h file so it
> should be rather easy to add a HAVE_STRUCT_SOCKADDR_IN6 define (or similar).
Well that certainly explains it! Where can I find this file? Also, this does
peek my interest a bit. I'm curious as to why we get this warning for
sockaddr_in6 but not in6_addr seeing as how sin6_addr (a member of
sockaddr_in6) has type in6_addr...
Dominick Meglio
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/c-ares
Received on Mon May 16 23:54:49 2005